It is important to self-evaluate yourself after doing a speech
because you can think about how you did critically and decide what you did
wrong, what you could improve on, and what your strengths were. I think that I
was successful in achieving the purpose of my speech. I had sufficient
background information on my topic and was able to demonstrate my topic
clearly. I was fairly confident during my speech. I did stutter once or twice
when trying to get out a long sentence, though. In my next speech, I will
improve by remembering not to use fillers. In my last two speeches, I used a
few umm’s and uh’s between sentences and when I lost my train of thought. If I
were to do the whole speech over again, I would have practiced my conclusion
more. At the end I was not as confident because I had focused a lot more on the
beginning and middle of my speech. In delivery, I would improve a little by
slowing down a bit. I thought that my organization worked just fine though
because it felt like each point followed the last logically and flowed into one
another. My one goal for improving the content of my speech would be to choose
a topic that was of more interest to me. I found it hard to say anything
interesting about the subject when I did not find it interesting or entertaining
at all. As I said before I could improve my delivery by slowing down, but I
could also make sure that I remember to speak clearly. When I first thought
back on my video, the first thing that I thought about was that my delivery was
not bad, but that it could have been more conversational. The most distracting
thing that I did during my speech was to touch my hair quite a few times. I
will definitely remember to pull my hair back next time because it kept falling
in my face, so I would move it away out of habit, without even noticing. I
would rate my eye contact as an 8.5/10. I thought that through the beginning
and middle I had good eye contact, but I remember that towards the end, where I
did not know my speech as well, I was forced to look down to check my note cards.
I only cited my sources twice, which was obviously not enough. I think it was
because I would remember the statement that I was trying to make, but I would
have trouble remembering which citation went with which one, so I did not say
them aloud. The other reason was that it felt a little strange saying your
citation aloud, so I kind of just passed over them. Based on my memory of how I
did, I would give myself an A because I think that I was able to meet each of the
requirements well. I did not miss any of the points that we were supposed to
make and was able to go above and beyond on some of them. Specifically, I followed the outline well, which made my speech flow well from intro to each main point and then concluded in a logical manner. I also think that I had practiced adequately for my speech and was able to deliver it without reading directly from my note cards, and I did manage to make it sound fairly conversational.
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Discussion on Testimony
The concept from the reading that I would like to discuss
today is the use of testimony as a type of supporting material. I chose this
because it was one that I was unfamiliar with on its definition and usage. The
definition of testimony is that they “rely on an individual's opinions or
experiences related to a particular topic.” Expert testimony is when you rely
on the stories and opinions of someone that is considered an “expert” on a
particular subject. This would typically make your speech more credible. The
second type is celebrity testimony. This is when you use testimony from someone that is
well-known and famous and because of that person’s status they are considered
to be knowledgeable and trustworthy on whatever the particular subject is. Lay testimony is when you use normal
people who are next experts or celebrities, but they may have close experience
with the topic. An example of this might be to interview teachers when
discussing state budget cuts. They’re not experts, but they could be considered
to have a relevant opinion about it.
Facts & Statistics
Including facts and statistics in your speech can cause you
to increase your credibility. It can also help your audience to come to an
agreement with your on how important your topic is. Using facts and statistics
can be the most effective in a speech when you are trying to make a logical
appeal. They can help you to prove your point by showing support for your topic
with concrete information that is hopefully verifiable and credible. Facts and
statistics have been very helpful to me when making persuasive speeches. Facts
and statistics might not be as effective if you are making an emotional appeal.
Facts and statistics can be interpreted differently by different people who
each have their own knowledge base, opinions, and backgrounds. In this case
facts and statistics could hurt your topic if you are not extremely clear on
how you mean them to be interpreted, but even then there is a chance that the
right message will not be received.
Saturday, September 22, 2012
Speech Buddy Videos (7.1)
The information I found that will be most helpful in my
speech was in video 7.1. Knowing about supporting material can be helpful in my
demonstration speech particularly when I talk about the history behind my
demonstration, but it will also be good to know when to include stories when I
talk about how my project affected me personally. The first thing that I
learned was that narratives can be useful, but that they only show one
perspective, and if they are too long they can be distracting and take away
from your speech. Examples can be helpful to clarify something that is
confusing, but they are not usually “generalizable”, meaning that may not
accurately represent your topic. Definitions are pretty self-explanatory, but
they can be boring if you just continually define everything in your speech. I will definitely be sure to choose my
supporting materials carefully, and now I have a greater understanding of the
pros and cons of each type of material that I can use.
Sunday, September 16, 2012
Topic from Chp 5
The topic from the reading that I would like to discuss today is
about adapting to a diverse audience. I think this is one of the most important
topics to talk about because in today’s society we are constantly being sold to
or convinced of something. More and more often, people have to convince large
groups of people to follow them or buy what they are selling or do something a certain
way. People like politicians and advertising companies have to find a way to
speak to us as their audience in a way that connects with each of us, who are
all very different and unique. This just shows how important finding your “target
audience” is. It must be very difficult to find a way to connect with so many
people who have varying opinions and backgrounds. In our public speaking class,
we have quite a few things in common, so find your target audience is not
really an issue, but out in the real world it makes all the difference. Your
information must be adjusted to interest and appeal to a diverse group of
people in order for you to be heard at all when speaking in public.
Audience Analysis & Adaptation
It is very important
to always analyze your audience and adapt to it based on what you know about
the people you will be speaking to. One thing that I found helpful is to identify
commonalities between yourself and the audience. Not only will this help them
to relate to you and your topic better, but it can also help you in feeling
more comfortable. It is also important when analyzing your audience to show how
credible you are when discussing the subject. Regardless of the diversity of
your audience, if you sound knowledgeable on your topic, they will probably be
more likely to listen to what you are saying. When adapting to your audience,
you have to consider their different backgrounds, beliefs, and/or values. You must
be more sensitive to things that may cause a reaction in your audience. I plan
on using audience analysis in my speech by remembering to consider the cultural
identities of the students in our class, and be sure to include everyone when I
speak. Also, I will remember to identify the commonalities we all share, which
I’m sure there are many.
Saturday, September 15, 2012
Chp 5 Speech Buddy Videos
In the light
pollution speech by Courtney, I thought the introduction could use some
improvement, but she had a good opening statement about how we probably have
heard about water pollutants, but most of us would not know much about light
pollution. It caught my interest. She made good use of her hands during the
brief clip that we watched of her speech. I noticed that as she stated her
thesis, she used her fingers to count off the three main points that she would
be talking about. This is something that I could learn from. Using your body
during your speech to accentuate what you’re saying is important. She also seemed
to be knowledgeable about her topic from what I could tell from the short clip.
In the drinking video from chapter 5, I noticed that Matthew seemed a little
nervous. He didn’t seem to have memorized his speech very well. He spent a lot
of time looking down at his cards and pausing. I thought his opening statement
was pretty funny though. At first, I wasn’t sure if he was hacking like that
for real or not. I liked his use of the projector to highlight some statistics
that were important to his topic. Being able to read the statistics yourself
made them a little bit easier to understand than if you were just listening to
the speaker read them for you. Something I could learn from in Matthew’s speech
is that almost seemed to use too many statistics, which can be boring.
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Chp 6 Concept: Library Resources
Exploring library resources is a valuable tool to have when
researching a speech topic. Not only can you physically go to the library and
check out what they have in person, but now you can also utilize the library’s
online resources. Books are often forgotten in this day and age due to the
simplicity and instant access to the internet. According to our text, books are
credible because they have already undergone a thorough editorial process and
even sometimes peer reviews. This can be crucial to sounding knowledgeable
about a speech topic, because you can rest easy knowing that other people have
deemed this information suitable enough to be put into print. Because magazines
and papers are published on such a regular, frequent basis, they can be great
tools for getting up-to-date information, such as recent statistics. The
reading this week has really reminded me just how helpful libraries can be in
researching a topic. I will have to remember to head to the library instead of
always just immediately going to the internet for information.
Chp 6 Videos
Video 6.1 Managing the Research Process,
although short, had some valuable information. I will work harder to determine
the validity of my resources. This is something that I have done only
half-heartedly in the past, but I see that it is extremely important if you want
to sound like a knowledgeable speaker. I do think that finding credible
speeches can be difficult because, not being an expert on the subject, I may
mistakenly think someone has the credentials to speak on whatever it is that
I’m researching. Also, watching the video reminded me what a great resource the
library really is. I think we have started to forget how valuable books can be
for research because internet is so instant and easy. I also see what a
valuable tool the librarian could be in assisting me in the right direction.
One of the most helpful tools for preparing for
speeches is watching other people do them. Shaura’s speech was especially
helpful because of her use of visual aids. Visual aids are something that I
underrate. I forget about how essential visual aids can be in getting your
point across. Dory’s impromptu speech was interesting because of her use of a
family story to make her point and show how important family is. The story
interested you enough to keep listening so that she would be able to hold your
attention to make her point.
Saturday, September 8, 2012
Conducting Research Interviews
When I first thought about it, I didn’t think I had ever
conducted any kind of interview. But once I thought about it for a while I
remembered that as a freshman in high school I had to interview someone in a
career I was interested in. I still remember it pretty well, though, because I
was so nervous that it took me hours before I could get the courage to call the
radio DJ I had decided to talk to. The whole thing went well, mostly because he
could tell I didn’t know what I was doing, and he was great at interviewing, so
he helped me out a lot. The part that needed the most improvement was my
questions that I had set up for the interview. I realized afterwards that I had
asked some of the wrong questions, so I didn’t get all the information that I
wanted. In chapter 6 of our book it tells us that the interview guide will
serve as a “road map” for getting the right information. At the time I didn’t
realize there were so many questions that you could develop, such as primary
versus secondary or open versus closed. Any advice I have for my fellow classmates would have to be that you need to really research types of questions you need to ask in order to receive the information you need. You have to direct the way the interview is going to go.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)